Recovering from selection bias in causal and statistical. Counterfactual framework and assumptions sage publishing. It was also called unconfoundedness, selection on the observables, or no omitted variable bias. Average causal effect an overview sciencedirect topics. It is the fundamental problem of causal inference and this definition of causal effect that make causal inference both more interesting and more difficult than the simple computation of correlational and associational measures.
Under the nointerference assumption, the potential outcomes of any individual are assumed to be unaffected by the treatment assignment of every. Selective and future ignorability in causal inference. The name rubin causal model was first coined by paul w. Given a causal graph g s augmented with a node sencoding the selection mechanism bareinboim and pearl 2012, the distribution q pyjx is said to be srecoverable from selection biased data in g s if the assumptions embedded in the causal model renders q expressible in terms of the distribution under. Such assumptions are usually made casually and are often implausible, in part because adequate information on confounders is not available. The implication is that causal inferences are allowed if it can be assumed that there is no confounding. Causal inference book jamie robins and i have written a book that provides a cohesive presentation of concepts of, and methods for, causal inference. Sep 02, 2015 here we discuss some issues with showing that the three instrumental variables assumptions hold in practice. In statistics, ignorability is a feature of an experiment design whereby the method of data collection and the nature of missing data do not depend on the missing data. Concerning the consistency assumption in causal inference.
Basic concepts of statistical inference for causal effects in. A defining characteristic of observational studies is that the assignment or selection mechanism is not. As jared said, in real world cases of observational data where there is a large number of variables and an even larger. I extend this notation and propose a refinement of the consistency assumption that makes clear that the consistency statement, as ordinarily given, is in fact an assumption and not an axiom or definition. Basic concepts of statistical inference for causal effects in experiments and observational studies donald b. Regarding causal inference in observational studies, in order to not violate the ignorability assumption which states that outcomes are independent from treatment, given a. Rubin department of statistics harvard university the following material is a summary of the course materials used in quantitative reasoning qr 33, taught by donald b. Jan 10, 2018 it is incorrect to suppose that the role of missing data analysis in causal inference is well understood. The science of why things occur is called etiology. Yet most theories have not found favor among empirical researchers by whom i mean those whose primary job is to collect and analyze data, as opposed to philosophers or theoreticians.
Models, reasoning, and inference from the worlds largest community of readers. The book is wellwritten with a very comprehensive coverage of many issues associated with causal inference. Jul 07, 2016 judea pearl points me to this discussion with kosuke imai at a conference on causal mediation. What is the best textbook for learning causal inference. We mainly address the problem of estimating causal effects from observational data. Causal inference, average treatment effect, propensity score, variable selection, penalized estimator, oracle estimator. Review sutva, assignment mechanism statistical science. This article focuses on the consistency assumption as considered within social epidemiology.
Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions andrew gelmany guido imbensz 5 oct 20 abstract the statistical and econometrics literature on causality is more focused on \e ects of causes than on \causes of e ects. We call the latter assumption the causal markov condition, and it is a stronger assumption than the markov condition. When we look at a textbook, we often see regression defined. Causal mediation statistical modeling, causal inference. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical. A fundamental assumption usually made in the potential outcomes approach to causal inference is that of no interference between individuals, a critical component of the stable unit treatment value assumption sutva. Introduction in the analysis of observational data, when attempting to establish the magnitude of the causal effect of treatment or exposure in the presence of confounding, the practitioner is faced with. Now with the second edition of this successful book comes the most uptodate treatment. The fundamental problem of causal inference is that only one. The entire system may be viewed as a multivariate model for the graphed variables, with the graph encoding various constraints on the joint distribution of these variables lauritzen, 1996, spirtes et al. Ignorability better called exogeneity simply means we can ignore how one ended up in one vs. However, in many settings, this assumption obviously does not hold. March 16, 2012 this is a thoughtful and well written book, covering important issues of causal inference in every.
Researchers adhering to missing data analysis invariably invoke an adhoc assumption called conditional ignorability, often decorated as ignorable treatment assignment mechanism, which is far from being well understood by those who make it, let. Ignorability for general longitudinal data biometrika oxford. In this paper, we outline selective ignorability assumptions mathematically and sketch how they may be used along with otherwise standard gestimation or likelihoodbased methods to obtain inference on structural nested models. Such selective ignorability assumptions may be used to derive valid causal inferences in conjunction with structural nested models. A fundamental assumption usually made in causal inference is that of no interference between individuals or units. Variable selection in causal inference using a simultaneous. The main difference between causal inference and inference of association is that the former analyzes the response of the effect variable when the cause is changed. Home page for the book, applied bayesian modeling and causal. The rubin causal model has also been connected to instrumental variables angrist, imbens, and rubin, 1996 and other techniques for causal inference. Mar 05, 2010 selective ignorability assumptions in causal inference joffe, marshall m yang, wei peter. Identification of the causal effect of a treatment t on an outcome y in observational studies is typically based either on the unconfoundedness assumption also called selection on observables, exogeneity, ignorability, see, e. It is incorrect to suppose that the role of missing data analysis in causal inference is well understood. Although matching is not itself a design of causal inference but a family of techniques to ensure balance on a series of observables and is thus based on the conditionalonobservables assumption, it is very useful as a first application to the potential outcomes language. I theproblemwithobservationaldataisthatthecomparisons maybeunfair.
Basic concepts of statistical inference for causal effects. Causal analysis in theory and practice missing data. Part of duke universitys causal inference bootcamp. In particular, the following themes were considered. Causal inference richard scheines in causation, prediction, and search cps hereafter, peter spirtes, clark glymour and i developed a theory of statistical causal inference.
An implicit assumption in our definition of counterfactual outcome is that an. Long discussion about causal inference and the use of hierarchical models to bridge between different inferential settings. Providing convincing evidence to support causal statements is often challenging because reverse causality, omitted factors, and chance can all create a correlation between a and b without a actually causing b. We explain how this assumption is articulated in the causal inference literature and give examples of how it might be violated for three common exposures in social epidemiology research. Identifiability, exchangeability and confounding revisited. No interference units do not interfere with each other. This book adopts a convention of the field that defines selection threat broadly.
For example, one can think of estimating the effect of single or multiple gene. Such assumptions are usually made casually, largely because they justify the. Causal inference in statistics is a broad area of research, under which many topics fall. Stable unit treatment value assumption groups balanced on all covariates. With a wide range of detailed, worked examples using real epidemiologic. But even for those not engaged in bayesian or causal modeling so far, the book is helpful in providing a first insight into the ideas of causal inference, missing data modeling, computation, and bayesian inference. While the former employs causal modelds for inferring about the expected observations often, about their statistical properties, the latter is concerned with inferring causal. The causal inference book updated 21 february 2020 in sas, stata, ms excel, and csv formats. Such assumptions are usually made casually, largely because they justify the use of. The potential outcomes framework was first proposed by jerzy neyman in his 1923 masters thesis, though he. Several researchers have shown that this phenomenon is generic when the data are generated under the causal diagram in figure 1a. Home gitbook getting started with causal inference. Providing convincing evidence to support causal statements is often challenging because reverse causality, omitted factors, and chance can all create a correlation between. A missing data mechanism such as a treatment assignment or survey sampling strategy is ignorable if the missing data matrix, which indicates which variables are observed or missing, is independent of the missing data.
Its aim is to present a survey of some recent research in causal inference. To tackle such questions, we will introduce the key ingredient that causal analysis depends oncounterfactual reasoningand describe the two most popular frameworks based on bayesian. Frangakisb three assumptions sufficient to identify the average causal effect are consistency, positivity, and exchangeability ie, no unmeasured confounders and no informative censoring, or ignorability of the treatment assignment and measurement of the out. Specifically, randomization implies ignorability, which means.
In his presentation at the notre dame conference and in his paper, this volume, glymour discussed the assumptions on which this. The second session focused on inference about causal discoveries from large observational data. Causal inference plays a fundamental role in medical science. Assumption of no confounding perhaps the most familiar challenge made to a causal inference from some study is that the investigator may have failed to observe some confounding variables. Selective ignorability assumptions in causal inference, the. Selective ignorability assumptions in causal inference. Causal inference has been explored by statisticians for nearly a century and continues to be an active research area in statistics. Jan 17, 2020 regarding causal inference in observational studies, in order to not violate the ignorability assumption which states that outcomes are independent from treatment, given a set of covariates, one. Selective ignorability assumptions in causal inference selective ignorability assumptions in causal inference joffe, marshall m yang, wei peter. Testing for the unconfoundedness assumption using an. Bias and causation, models and judgment for valid comparisons.
Causal inference is the identification of a causal relation between a and b. The first step in doing that successfully is understanding what, exactly, they mean by assumption. We first motivate the use of causal inference through examples in domains such as recommender systems, social media datasets, health, education and governance. Written by pioneers in the field, this practical book presents an authoritative yet accessible overview of the methods and applications of causal inference. Dags that are interpreted causally are called causal graphs. Controlling selection bias in causal inference formally, the distinction between these biases can be articulated thus. A missing data mechanism such as a treatment assignment or survey sampling strategy is ignorable if the missing data matrix, which indicates which variables are observed or missing, is independent of the missing data conditional on the observed data.
In particular, the distribution of the disturbances induces a joint distribution of the graphed variables which obeys the markov decomposition. Y i1 and y i0 are potential outcomes in that they represent the outcomes for individual i had they received the treatment or control respectively. Here we discuss some issues with showing that the three instrumental variables assumptions hold in practice. Another line of work in the causal inference community relates to bounding the estimate of the average treatment effect given an instrumental variable 6, 7, or under hidden confounding, for. Most attempts at causal inference in observational studies are based on assumptions that treatment assignment is ignorable. Causal inference and predictive comparison causal inference.
In two recent communications, cole and frangakis1 and vanderweele2 interpret the consistency rule of causal inference an assumption that is violated whenever versions of. Lsat logical reasoning questions often ask you to identify the assumption of an argument. Such assumptions are usually made casually, largely because they justify the use of available statistical methods and not because they are truly believed. Inference and asymptotic theory causal inference provides a natural testbed for classical asymptotic theory, in particular, semiparametric inference. Its a convenient way to assume the sufficiency of a set of controls without needing to formally justify why thats the case, but to explain what it means in a real context for a layman, you would need to invoke a causal story, that is causal assumptions, and you can formally tell that story with the help of causal graphs. Multilevel causal inference in observational studies. This leap between exposures as measured and exposures as intervened upon is typically supported by the consistency assumption. Y i0 where y i1 y it i 1 for some treatment variable t.
Much of this material is currently scattered across journals in several disciplines or confined to technical articles. The consistency assumption for causal inference in social. Causal inference in statistics and the quantitative sciences. The assumption that exposures as measured in observational settings have clear and specific definitions underpins epidemiologic research and allows us to use observational data to predict outcomes in interventions. In 1986 the international journal of epidemiology published identifiability, exchangeability and epidemiological confounding. Because largescale experiments are costly, social scientists frequently draw causal inferences from observational data based on a simplifying assumption of conditional ignorability. The definition of causal effect requires this assumption so that the difference, y i 1. This book is what it is meant to bea showcase of different aspects of highly interesting areas of statistics. Causal inference is an admittedly pretentious title for a book. The rubin causal model rcm, also known as the neymanrubin causal model, is an approach to the statistical analysis of cause and effect based on the framework of potential outcomes, named after donald rubin. Long discussion about causal inference and the use of. Joffe, etal 2010, selective ignorability assumptions in causal inference, the international journal of biostatistics.
Conditional exchangeability is also known as ignorability or the no unmeasured confounding assumption. Given that causal mediation analysis relies on the sequential ignorability assumption howe, 2019, that is, that the mediator is effectively randomly assigned given baseline covariates and the. Identifying and estimating the impact or causal effect of an intervention, however, depends fundamentally on the assumption of no omitted variables or selection on. Judea pearl points me to this discussion with kosuke imai at a conference on causal mediation. For more on the connections between the rubin causal model, structural equation modeling, and other statistical methods for causal inference, see morgan and winship 2007 8. I continue to think that the most useful way to think about mediation is in terms of a joint or multivariate outcome, and i continue to think that if we want to understand mediation, we need to think about potential interventions or instruments in different places in a system. There is an arrow from x to y in a causal graph involving a set of variables v just in case x is a direct cause of y relative to v. We do so by applying the machinery of causal inference pearl, 2009. Y i1 isthepotentialoutcomeofpersoni iftheyare giventhetreatment,andy i0 isthepotentialoutcomeiftheyare giventhecontrol. In the terminology of a book we recently published, the term causal inference comprises both causal reasoning and causal discovery, two somewhat inverse scenarios. Sep 30, 2018 the application of causal inference methods is growing exponentially in fields that deal with observational data. Gary king, harvard university, massachusetts the second edition of counterfactuals and causal inference should be part of the personal library of any social scientist who is engaged in quantitative research. For example, one can think of estimating the effect of single or. The application of causal inference methods is growing exponentially in fields that deal with observational data.
736 959 1283 1105 986 348 482 36 1211 970 784 415 270 750 232 1443 44 615 1494 380 408 826 180 1408 1149 404 191 225 150 112 1457 1295 1107 1491 501 579 1404 846